Say you’ve just been
diagnosed with a serious disorder. You have undertaken every measure
to alleviate the situation in accordance with your doctor’s orders,
from treatment at the practice to at-home solutions. However, things
apparently got worse and the nasty kicker comes during a return
visit: the treatment was for a different ailment.
In this case, you may
consider suing the practitioner for malpractice. Yet how can you push
a misdiagnosis case to be airtight?
Claiming misdiagnosis in
your malpractice claim requires a deeper understanding of the
concept, which is something a skilled expert witness can help you
with. A delayed diagnosis may be marked for liability if the health
care professional did not fully account for the scope of the illness
during the consultation. Tests may have been out of the question if
the signs of the ailment in its advanced stages are evident.
Meanwhile, an “inaccurate
diagnosis” can be cited if the medical practitioner indeed ran
tests on the patient but the level of testing was insufficient or the
results were not fully analyzed. A “failure to diagnose”, on the
other hand, may be in order if the professional did not recommend
testing to be carried out.
The respondents in a
medical malpractice case do not have to be the practitioners
themselves. In some instances, an assistant may be held culpable.
Above all, your case should delve into how much damage the
misdiagnosis inflicted upon you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment